International Relations: Theory of Realism Essay Sample

Hans J. Morgenthau (1904–1980) developed realism into acomprehensive international relations theory. Influenced by theProtestant theologian and political writer Reinhold Niebuhr, as well asby Hobbes, he places selfishness and power-lust at the center of hispicture of human existence. The insatiable human lust for power,timeless and universal, which he identifies with animusdominandi, the desire to dominate, is for him the main cause ofconflict. As he asserts in his main work, Politics among Nations:The Struggle for Power and Peace, first published in 1948,“international politics, like all politics, is a struggle forpower” (25).

Free sample essay on theories of international relations: The Realist School of Thought.

Realism is seen as a direct response to idealism and is also heavily criticised for being overly simplistic and somewhat irrelevant to modern world politics.


Essay on realism in ir | La Gnosis de Hoy

Therefore, “realist novels typically end in fall or failure, often as an ironic commentary on social values of self-improvement or success.

Although Carr and Morgenthau concentrate primarily on internationalrelations, their realism can also be applied to domestic politics. Tobe a classical realist is in general to perceive politics as a conflict ofinterests and a struggle for power, and to seek peace by recognizing common interests and trying to satisfy them, rather than by moralizing. Bernard Williams and Raymond Geuss, influential representatives of the new political realism, a movement in contemporary political theory, criticize what they describe as “political moralism” and stress the autonomy of politics against ethics. However, political theory realism and international relations realism seem like two separate research programs. As noted by several scholars (William Scheuerman, Alison McQueen, Terry Nardin. Duncan Bell), those who contribute to realism in political theory give little attention to those who work on realism in international politics.


This essay will attempt to critically examine these ..

(1) Human nature is a starting point for classical political realism. Realists view human beings as inherently egoistic and self-interested to the extent that self-interest overcomes moralprinciples. At the debate in Sparta, described in Book I ofThucydides’ History, the Athenians affirm the priorityof self-interest over morality. They say that considerations of rightand wrong have “never turned people aside from the opportunitiesof aggrandizement offered by superior strength” (chap. 1 par.76).

Free international relations theory Essays and Papers

Political realism is usually contrasted by IR scholars with idealismor liberalism, a theoretical perspective that emphasizes internationalnorms, interdependence among states, and international cooperation. The“Melian Dialogue,” which is one of the most frequentlycommented-upon parts of Thucydides’ History, presentsthe classic debate between the idealist and realist views: Caninternational politics be based on a moral order derived from theprinciples of justice, or will it forever remain the arena ofconflicting national interests and power?

Free international relations theory ..

In the discipline of international relations there are contendinggeneral theories or theoretical perspectives. Realism, also known aspolitical realism, is a view of international politics that stressesits competitive and conflictual side. It is usually contrasted withidealism or liberalism, which tends to emphasize cooperation. Realistsconsider the principal actors in the international arena to be states,which are concerned with their own security, act in pursuit of theirown national interests, and struggle for power. The negative side ofthe realists’ emphasis on power and self-interest is often theirskepticism regarding the relevance of ethical norms to relations amongstates. National politics is the realm of authority and law, whereasinternational politics, they sometimes claim, is a sphere withoutjustice, characterized by active or potential conflict amongstates.