Respect is the core of family relationships and harmony. A family is constantly changing and growing, if not in numbers of members, then in life experiences. Respect can be practiced in each new situation to establish and continue a pattern of respect among the family members.
Another source of dissatisfaction with Kant's account has been withhis characterization of persons and the quality in virtue of whichthey must be respected. In particular, Kant's view that the rationalwill which is common to all persons is the ground of respect isthought to ignore the moral importance of the concrete particularityof each individual, and his emphasis on autonomy, which is oftenunderstood to involve the independence of one person from all others,is thought to ignore the essential relationality of human beings(forexample, Noggle 1999, Farley 1993, Dillon 1992a, E. Johnson1982). Rather than ignoring what distinguishes one person fromanother, it is argued, respect should involve attending to each personas a distinctive individual and to the concrete realities of humanlives, and it should involve valuing difference as well as samenessand interdependence as well as independence. Other critics respondthat respecting differences and particular identities inevitablyreintroduces hierarchical discrimination that is antithetical to theequality among persons that the idea of respect for persons issupposed to express (for example, Bird 2004). Identity and differencemay, however, be appropriate objects of other forms of considerationand appreciation.
Ask: Who shows respect (or caring) in this story?
There’salso the point about men being more competitive, women more cooperative. Again,though, cooperation is much more useful than competition for closerelationships. What use is there in competing against your spouse? But in largegroups, getting to the top can be crucial. The male an orientation toward the large group, not a dislike ofintimacy. And remember, most men didn’t reproduce, and we’re mainly descendedfrom the men who did fight their way to the top. Not so for women.
No Respect For Teachers Essay Sample
These relationships are reciprocal because they allow a back-and-forth exchange of ideas, opinions, feelings, and of respect itself; they are symmetrical because they help create an equal footing from which we can be responsive to the other person's unique qualities and needs.
Let's Talk About Respect - webuus
Hudson (1980) draws a four-fold distinction among kinds of respect,according to the bases in the objects. Consider the following sets ofexamples: (a) respecting a colleague highly as a scholar and having alot of respect for someone with “guts”; (b) a mountainclimber's respect for the elements and a tennis player's respect forher opponent's strong backhand; (c) respecting the terms of anagreement and respecting a person's rights; and (d) showing respectfor a judge by rising when she enters the courtroom and respecting aworn-out flag by burning it rather than tossing it in the trash. Therespect in (a), evaluative respect, is similar to otherfavorable attitudes such as esteem and admiration; it is earned ordeserved (or not) depending on whether and to the degree that theobject is judged to meet certain standards. Obstaclerespect, in (b), is a matter of regarding the object as somethingthat, if not taken proper account of in one's decisions about how toact, could prevent one from achieving one's ends. The objects of (c)directive respect are directives: things such as requests,rules, advice, laws, or rights claims that may be taken as guides toaction. One respects a directive when one's behaviors intentionallycomply with it. The objects of (d) institutional respect aresocial institutions or practices, the positions or roles definedwithin an institution or practice, and persons or things that occupythe positions or represent the institution. Institutional respect isshown by behavior that conforms to rules that prescribe certainconduct as respectful. These four forms of respect differ in severalways. Each identifies a quite different kind of feature of objects asthe basis of respect. Each is expressed in action in quite differentways, although evaluative respect need not be expressed at all, onecan have institutional respect for an institution (e.g., the criminaljustice system) without showing it for a particular element of it (thejudge in this trial), and directive respect is not an attitude thatone might or might not express but a mode of conduct motivated by arecognition of the directive's authority. Evaluative respectcentrally involves having a favorable attitude toward the object,while the other forms do not. Directive respect does not admit ofdegrees (one either obeys the rule or doesn't), but the others do (wecan have more evaluative respect for one person than another). Hudsonuses this distinction to argue that respect for persons is not aunique kind of respect but should be conceived rather as involvingsome combination or other of these four.